Case Against Pure Geniuses
November 17th, 2008A few months back I tried to force more knowledge into my partially rusty brain by reading good recommended books. Even though it wasn’t very successful, I did manage to finish a few books. One of them is Malcolm Gladwell’s instant classic: The Tipping Point.
I read about the author some years ago when I started reading blogs. It didn’t intrigue me enough to explore more about his pieces then. Only after watching his impressively detailed talk about spaghetti sauce at TED, I knew I had to read his books someday. The Tipping Point was an eye opener that simply floored me with even more massive detail exploration that I had never expected coming from a journalist. And what a perfect pace and delivery.
Of course talking about Gladwell should also cover his no less popular other book: Blink. Alas, I haven’t gotten a chance to read it. But what I want to share in this post is his upcoming (soon) book: Outliers: The Story of Success.
Guardian posted “A gift or hard graft?” last Saturday, an edited extract from Outliers. Here Gladwell attempted to scrutinize a classic observation about pure talent v.s. hardwork and chance. I believe it won’t be a spoiler if I just say the tagline (enjoyment in reading Gladwell’s is in his detail analysis, not the deduction): one can be very successful if he has amassed enough hours on it (hardwork) — the magic number is: 10,000 hours — and was born in the right time (chance). Obviously it’s not an exact science but coming from Gladwell, as usual, will be very convincing.
Being a person who doesn’t add much salt when it comes to writings from liked authors, I concede that my [only slightly above] mediocrity is because I haven’t belted 10,000 hours in anything. As for my birth year, I think it did just fine.